This referendum is NOT a request to raise your property taxes.
It is to determine if the citizens of these communities want to
install an affordable very high capacity connection to each residence
and business in our cities.
The cities do not intend a municipal broadband system to impact
taxes. Similar to electric and water utilities, this broadband utility
would be self-supporting. If Geneva, St. Charles and Batavia all
decide to move forward with the project, link the three infrastructures
and share some of the costs, the project will cost approximately
a total of $62 million for all three communities. The cost will
be shared proportionately according to the size of the community.
An independent feasibility study, which was also independently audited,
concluded that the General Obligation Bonds issued to fund this
project would be retired by user fees, without having to raise taxes.
What this means is that only the people who use these services
will pay for these services.
If the program fails and people do not subscribe to these services
in enough volume to pay back the bonds, some of the cost may be
added to our taxes. However, the independent feasibility study projects
that the program will NOT fail, and of the over 500 other communities
in the country that have created a similar program, NONE HAVE FAILED.
One of the key factors in the success of the other communities is
that the cities already have their own municipal electric utility,
as we do.
The cities have indicated that if, despite all of their research
and the findings of two consulting companies, the revenues from
Tri-City Broadband would not be enough to pay off the bonds, raising
property taxes would be their LAST remedy.
As in all business ventures, there is an element of risk, and it
would be irresponsible not to remind voters of this. But it's like
going to the hospital for a minor procedure... before they put you
under, they have to tell you that there's a chance you won't wake
up.
A Citizen Survey conducted in June 2001 asked:
"If it was available, would you be interested
in a broadband/combined service?"
In Batavia, 71% answered YES
In Geneva, 73.4% answered YES
In St. Charles, 74.2% answered YES
Here's the estimated market share that the Feasibility Study said
we should be able to obtain (not by Day 1):
Service |
% of market |
Residential Video |
34% |
Residential High Speed Data |
13.2% |
Residential Telephone |
7.5% |
Service |
% of market |
Commercial Video |
1% |
Commercial High Speed Data |
17.5% |
Commercial Telephone |
11.3% |
As you can see, the study was based on a very low percentage of
users who would subscribe to these services. Citizen surveys indicate
a MUCH higher level of interest and willingness to use the new services.
Here's the market share we need to break even (again, not by Day
1)
Service |
% of market |
Residential Video |
25% |
Residential High Speed Data |
4% |
Residential Telephone |
5% |
Service |
% of market |
Commercial Video |
1% |
Commercial High Speed Data |
4% |
Commercial Telephone |
8% |
|